Current:Home > reviewsCalifornia lawmakers vote to reduce deficit by $17 billion, but harder choices lie ahead -Aspire Money Growth
California lawmakers vote to reduce deficit by $17 billion, but harder choices lie ahead
View
Date:2025-04-16 15:12:24
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California lawmakers don’t know for sure how big their budget deficit is, but on Thursday they decided it’s big enough to go ahead and reduce spending by about $17 billion.
The vote represents a preemptive strike from Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, who is trying to get ahead of a stubborn shortfall that has been increasing every month and will likely extend into next year and beyond — when the second-term governor could be eyeing a campaign for the White House.
In his first term in office, Newsom enjoyed a series of historic surpluses and oversaw a vast expansion of government services. But that growth ended last year, when the state had a shortfall of nearly $32 billion.
Things got worse in January when Newsom announced another deficit of $38 billion. The nonpartisan Legislative Analyst’s Office said the shortfall was actually $58 billion because they said Newsom should have included some reductions in public education spending. Then in February the LAO updated its deficit estimate to $73 billion after state revenues continued to come in below projections.
Since then, Newsom and his Democratic allies in the state Legislature have been doing everything they can to make that deficit smaller. Last month, they raised a tax on the companies that manage the state’s Medicaid program to bring in an extra $1.5 billion.
There were no headline-grabbing cuts in the reductions lawmakers approved on Thursday. Despite California’s recent budget woes, the Democrats in charge have refused to raise income taxes or impose steep cuts to the most expensive programs, including health care and public education.
Instead, most of the savings comes from either cancelling or delaying spending that was approved in previous years but hasn’t yet been spent. It also relies on a number of accounting tricks to make the shortfall appear smaller, including shifting paychecks for state workers by one day from June 30 to July 1 so the state can count $1.6 billion in salaries for the next fiscal year.
By doing this, Democrats are betting California’s budget problems are only temporary. The state is known for wild swings in revenue, especially given its overreliance on wealthy taxpayers who make most of their money from the stock market.
“We’re trying to make thoughtful choices here,” said Jesse Gabriel, a Democrat and chair of the Assembly Budget Committee. “At the same time, from my perspective one of the worst outcomes here would be to make a cut to a critical program that serves our most vulnerable folks and to later realize that you didn’t need to make that cut.”
Republicans have long complained about Democrats’ approach to the budget deficits, arguing lawmakers should make structural changes to the state’s spending to better align with the reality of the state’s revenues. On Thursday, Republican Assemblymember Vince Fong declared it “only pushes this crisis into the future.”
Still, Democrats have been saying for months they will likely be forced to make “tough decisions” on the budget later this year. The LAO has projected a deficit of $30 billion next year, which would be the third consecutive year of a multibillion-dollar shortfall.
“We’re not going to solve this problem anymore by just stopping one-time spending,” Democratic Assemblymember Cottie Petrie-Norris said.
veryGood! (93)
Related
- Residents worried after ceiling cracks appear following reroofing works at Jalan Tenaga HDB blocks
- Save 56% on an HP Laptop and Get 1 Year of Microsoft Office and Wireless Mouse for Free
- Recession, retail, retaliation
- Former NFL players are suing the league over denied disability benefits
- A White House order claims to end 'censorship.' What does that mean?
- House approves NDAA in near-party-line vote with Republican changes on social issues
- Federal Trade Commission's request to pause Microsoft's $69 billion takeover of Activision during appeal denied by judge
- Search continues for nursing student who vanished after calling 911 to report child on side of Alabama freeway
- 2 killed, 3 injured in shooting at makeshift club in Houston
- The social cost of carbon: a powerful tool and ethics nightmare
Ranking
- Megan Fox's ex Brian Austin Green tells Machine Gun Kelly to 'grow up'
- Indian authorities accuse the BBC of tax evasion after raiding their offices
- In a Bold Move, California’s Governor Issues Ban on Gasoline-Powered Cars as of 2035
- Get to Net-Zero by Mid-Century? Even Some Global Oil and Gas Giants Think it Can Be Done
- Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
- Meet the judge deciding the $1.6 billion defamation case against Fox News
- Noxious Neighbors: The EPA Knows Tanks Holding Heavy Fuels Emit Harmful Chemicals. Why Are Americans Still at Risk?
- Biden Could Reduce the Nation’s Production of Oil and Gas, but Probably Not as Much as Many Hope
Recommendation
Costco membership growth 'robust,' even amid fee increase: What to know about earnings release
Are your savings account interest rates terribly low? We want to hear from you
Inside Clean Energy: In South Carolina, a Happy Compromise on Net Metering
Race, Poverty, Farming and a Natural Gas Pipeline Converge In a Rural Illinois Township
Are Instagram, Facebook and WhatsApp down? Meta says most issues resolved after outages
Noxious Neighbors: The EPA Knows Tanks Holding Heavy Fuels Emit Harmful Chemicals. Why Are Americans Still at Risk?
Conservative Justices Express Some Support for Limiting Biden’s Ability to Curtail Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Super Bowl commercials, from Adam Driver(s) to M&M candies; the hits and the misses