Current:Home > ScamsAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -Aspire Money Growth
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
View
Date:2025-04-17 08:27:55
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (6)
Related
- Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
- From 'Beverly Hills Cop 4' to 'The Beekeeper,' 10 movies you need to stream right now
- Philadelphia radio host Howard Eskin suspended from Phillies home games over ‘unwelcome kiss’
- Where Kyle Richards and Mauricio Umansky Stand One Year After Their Breakup
- Why we love Bear Pond Books, a ski town bookstore with a French bulldog 'Staff Pup'
- Flying objects and shrunken heads: World UFO Day feted amid surge in sightings, government denials
- Screenwriter Robert Towne, known for 'Chinatown' and 'The Last Detail,' dies at 89
- Do US fast-food customers want plant-based meat? Panda Express thinks so, but McDonald’s has doubts
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Jamaica braces for 'extremely dangerous' Hurricane Beryl: Live updates
Ranking
- John Galliano out at Maison Margiela, capping year of fashion designer musical chairs
- Beyoncé, Tina Knowles tap Victoria Monét for new Cécred hair care video
- Tigers broadcaster Craig Monroe being investigated for alleged criminal sexual conduct
- LeBron James agrees to a 2-year extension with the Los Angeles Lakers, AP source says
- EU countries double down on a halt to Syrian asylum claims but will not yet send people back
- You Know You Love Blake Lively's Reaction to Ryan Reynolds Thirst Trap
- Cheez-It partners with Hidden Valley Ranch to create new zesty, cheesy snack
- Ann Wilson shares cancer diagnosis, says Heart concert tour is postponed: 'This is merely a pause'
Recommendation
Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
Open on July 4th: Retailers and airlines. Closed: Government, banks, stock market
Those viral 'Love Island' cast photos, Kylie Jenner and when cosmetic treatments age you
Georgia election workers who won $148M judgment against Giuliani want his bankruptcy case thrown out
Appeals court scraps Nasdaq boardroom diversity rules in latest DEI setback
I wasn't allowed a smartphone until I was 16. I can't thank my parents enough.
Gracie Abrams Reveals Travis Kelce’s Fearless Words Before Appearing on Stage With Taylor Swift
Southwest Air adopts ‘poison pill’ as activist investor Elliott takes significant stake in company